PIEB call for reviewers

PIEB call for reviewers

Call for reviewers

The high-quality peer-review process is necessary for establishing the reputation of every scientific journal. PIEB Editorial Board announces a call for reviewers. We are looking for academic professionals specializing in various areas of innovation and development such as economics, management, business, science and R&D, innovation management, innovations in education, ICT development, social aspects of innovation. Therefore, if you would like to share your professional opinion and have an impact on PIEB development PIEB call for reviewers form and send it to publications@pradec.eu.

Requirements

- Possess a doctoral degree;
- Be fluent in academic English;
- Hold an academic affiliation;
- Work effectively under tight deadlines.

What do we offer?

Reviewing is voluntary. However, reviewers’ names will be published on the PIEB website and listed once a year in a printed volume. Additionally, we offer 50% discount for the reviewers' submissions to PIEB.

PICP guide to authors

Guide to submissions for PRADEC interdisciplinary conference proceedings

Conference calls

  • Submissions of papers should be related to the specific Conference call. Authors of abstracts and full-text submissions must carefully read all requirements and conditions, including acceptance criteria, posted by the Program Committee of a conference. 

Format of submissions

  • Submissions of papers should be related to the specific Conference call. Authors of abstracts and full-text submissions must carefully read all requirements and conditions, including acceptance criteria, posted by the Program Committee of a conference.
  • Please read the following guidelines and use the PICP article submission format for submission of your paper since only articles formatted accordingly may be accepted.
  • The volume of paper should be at least 4 pages, but not exceeding 15 pages of А4 format. Articles must be written in English. Papers should be printed in MS Word, Time New Roman font (size 12), with 1.5 interval. Tables and pictures must be handled with MS Word drawing tools and supported by source references. 
  • Literature references should be placed at the end of the paper and represented in the required form. Papers should be provided by the following requisites: Name of paper; List of keywords; Summary in the beginning (a maximum of 150 words); References in required form 
  • At the end of paper author should precisely specify the following: first name and surname; scientific degree; country of citizenship; affiliated with a given author a research or other organization (company); e-mails (main and alternative); phones with codes (office and mobile); the convenient detailed post address, on which author wishes to receive the journal after printing. 
  • Given publications should have research character and must be based on principles of scientific and a professional etiquette. The papers are subject for the peer-review process by editorial and independent experts.

Language

  • Submissions must be written in English.

Title

  • Concise and informative. Avoid abbreviations.

Author names and affiliations

  • Full names should be provided. Please indicate affiliations of the author. Indicate the authors' affiliation addresses below the names. Indicate all affiliations with a lower-case superscript letter immediately after the Author's name and in front of the appropriate address.

Contacts

  • Ensure that telephone and fax numbers (with country and area code) are provided in addition to the e-mail address and the complete postal address.

Abstract

  • A concise abstract should briefly state the purpose of the research and the main results. An abstract must be presented in English and separate from the article, so it must be able to stand alone.

Illustrations

  • Graphics should be done in MS Word and must be editable.

Tables

  • Tables should be numbered consecutively in the text in Arabic numerals and printed on separate sheets. Any manuscript which does not conform to the above instructions may be returned for the necessary revision before publication.

Footnotes

  • The use of footnotes should be kept to a minimum and numbered consecutively throughout the text with superscript Arabic numerals.

Selection of papers and publication fee

  • First, the selected papers will be recommended to publish by the Conference Program Committee. After this, the papers will undergo the peer-review process. Only passed the peer-review procedure articles will be included in the Conference proceedings publication. Delegates are provided with free publication fee option. In this case, the presenting author must be a paid registrant at the Conference. The Conference does not provide financial support nor registration fee waivers for any presentations.
  • Accepted article ONLINE publication fee for non-delegates is 125 Euro, due to pay only after accepting the paper. 

Paper submission deadline

  • Submit all Abstracts electronically, using the link found at the conference website or related websites. Abstracts and full-text final submissions must be submitted prior to the relevant deadlines. Thes deadlines will be strictly observed.
  • All Abstracts must be submitted via the conference WEB system or other suggested email options. Submissions sent via e-mail, fax, or regular mail will not be processed or acknowledged. Electronic copies of paper can be sent to publications@pradec.eu no later than the fixed deadlines in a conference call.

Important

  • Payments must be done only after the final letter of acceptance of a paper for publication.

PICP paper submission

PICP (Conference Proceedings) online submission form

[recaptcha]

Submission terms and conditions

The author and co-authors of the article strictly commit to the policy of editors by accepting these terms and conditions

  • Authors are responsible to read and accept fee (215 euro) payment obligations of the targeted journal. The website has clear information about publication fees and payment terms. When paper accepted and published the author is obliged to fulfill his/ her fee payment obligations in the shortest time after the invoice issued.
  • The primary version of the journal is the online version. Therefore, we do not send a printed copy to the author(s) of the published article. Publisher does not make profits via subscription or sales of print copies. The publisher offers the full content for free access to the public and without restrictions. 
  • All rules and requirements relevant to the chosen type of submission are read and understood. Sending submission means accepted by the author/submitter all responsibility related to editorial and publishing conditions.
  • Submission technical requirements are read and accepted in designing and preparing the research paper
  • Please note that scientific editing might change the format and correct the writing to make it conventional with editorial policy.
  • Responsibility for facts and opinions presented in the contents of journals, electronic and/or printed rests exclusively with the authors, other submitters if there is relevance. Their interpretations do not necessarily reflect the views of publisher or editors, affiliated or partnering with journals and with authors institutions.
  • F.A.Q. must be visited if there is an additional reason in clarifying editorial policy. The editors can contact editors via email when it is accepted
  • Neither the publisher nor the editors can be held responsible for errors or any consequences arising from the use of information contained in this journal.
  • Rejected manuscripts will not be returned to the author.
  • The submitted article after evaluation can be published in elaborating/projecting online issues which differ ahead/or back from the submission date up to 3 consequent issues or 6 months interval. 
  • The version of an article which is published online is considered the final and complete version. Even though it is possible to correct this version, our policy (in common with other publishers) is not to do so, except in very limited circumstances. When an author wishes to update the published paper it can be possible within 4 weeks after publication. 
  • Article after the publication is not subject to removal, except for the sole discretion of the publisher. When editors screen, review and publish the article online or/end in print the article cannot be withdrawn until the decision of editors and publisher. The published articles go immediately to indexing archives and DOI depositories. 
  • Full rights for the removal of the publication of the article remain to the publisher. Retraction or removal of published article can arise in very rear and exceptional circumstances. Usually, it takes a long time to make a deeper analysis, examination of reasons and negotiations.
  • After receiving of the article editors and publisher usually publish immediately online the metadata. After screening and reviewing the full article can be published. The time length between submission and publication of metadata and the full article can be different and make hours, days or months. All this process is usually related to merits, quality of the paper, internal editorial processes, other factors. When necessary, the editors can issue proof of acceptance to the applied author.
  • The author is responsible for avoiding multiple submissions of the same article to other journals. PRADEC editors can charge authors for additional fees when it will be found that similar article was published in parallel. We can contact and inform the relevant journals about multiple practice of the author. When there are signs and suspicions about duplicate submission behaviour of the authors the publisher monitors periodically online during 12 weeks.
  • Website content, information, or terms and conditions may be revised without formal notice. We cannot guarantee that this website will be updated on a regular basis or otherwise provide the most current or accurate information that may be available.
  • No part of the material protected by this copyright notice may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the copyright owner.

PICP call for papers

SHORT PUBLISHER NOTICE ON 2018 CALL FOR PAPERS

OPEN CALL FOR PUBLICATIONS, CONFERENCE "4th Cross Industry Technology Transfer and Innovation Conference and Networking 2018 (TTI - 2018)".

Deadline for full papers – July 23, 2018

Aim of the TTI Conference 

The aim of the conference is to discuss theoretical issues and practical experience in technology transfer and innovation through various industry clusters.
The conference brings together the administrators, managers, researchers, and professionals from high schools, research think tanks, business companies, governmental structures and nongovernmental institutions to provide a comprehensive platform to share ideas and experiences. 

Thematic areas of TTI Conference 

The Conference covers various areas as Mechanical engineering and new materials; Transportation technologies; Biotechnology and medical technology; Nanotechnology; Ecology and environment; Information technology; Food industry; Textiles; Energy and renewable energy resources.
 
The following thematic sections form the focus areas of research and practical insights:
 
• Technology and innovation policy framework
• Academic and industry innovation case studies
• Design and models of technology transfer. Stakeholders
• Academic-based technology transfer
• Technology transfer  and regional economy
• SME and  technology  transfer  potential
 
Other thematic areas and topics relevant to the field of the conference are welcome.

Electronic copies of paper must be sent to publications@pradec.eu

ARTICLE TEMPLATE: You can PICP article submission format.

ONLINE SUBMISSION TOOL: You can also submit online here

OTHER: Further detailed instruction on submission rules to PICP Conference proceedings you can read here

MHSJ call for editors

Call for Editorial Board Members

The publisher would like to invite you to submit your application to join the Editorial Board of the journal as an Editorial Advisory Board (AB) member. The support of an EAB member will certainly be crucial to the development, quality, and success of the journal.

As AB member (general member or affiliated with a certain journal scope area(s)) you could assist in the following ways:
- submitting research material
- reviewing for the journal
- recommending external reviewers 
- advising on matters of journal development
- encouraging article submissions to the journal from your affiliated circles 
- providing occasional guest editorials or guest editing a special issue
- representing and promoting the journal at conferences

Serving as a member of the board is voluntary. The journal is mainly small-scale, free and open-access. We significantly differ from those printed and open-access journals requiring high submission fees and/or selling full-text articles to their readers. Selected invited or papers in limited special cases are published even free of charge. The journal is published and fully financed by the Prague Development Center and non-for-profit Innovation and Technology Management Academy (ITMA).
Affiliations to our journals, therefore, are not fee-based. However, members can benefit with special conditions for the academic publishing opportunities.

Motivated researchers should send their letter of interest to  bd@pradec.eu and/or  info@itma.cz . 
We look forward to receiving your application.

Publishers:
Prague Development Center
Innovation and Technology Management Academy
https://academicpublishingplatforms.com/journal.php?journal=MHSJ
http://www.pradec.eu/

MHSJ call for reviewers

IMPORTANT: This note can be somehow similar to other few journals of the publisher (Prague Development Center). Therefore, the text may partially or completely coincide with the requirements in other journals - BEH, PIEB, and ATI. If you are interested in reviewing articles for PRADEC journals, we would like to invite your participation. Manuscript reviewers are vital to the publications process.

Call for reviewers

The high-quality peer-review process is necessary for establishing the reputation of every scientific journal. MHSJ invites experienced medical researchers to collaborate with us as reviewers. The Journal is especially interested in reviewers who have expertise and interest in the following specialties and clinical topics: surgery, general medicine, orthopedics, cardiology, dermatology, gastroenterology, nephrology, neurology, pediatrics, rheumatology, urology, obstetrics and gynecology, internal medicine, medical genetics, otolaryngology, physical medicine and rehabilitation, psychiatry. Other areas of medical specialization are also accountable.

The charge of reviewers is to evaluate the quality, relevance, and merit of submitted papers. Reviews must be as complete and detailed as possible and contain clear opinions about strengths, weaknesses, relevance, and importance to the field. Preferably, reviewers should consider themselves as mentors to the author(s) and comments should be specific and constructive and suggestions should be intended to enhance the manuscript.

Therefore, if you would like to share your professional opinion and have an impact on MHSJ development please fill in the survey and send it to publications@pradec.eu.

Requirements

- Possess a doctoral degree in the medical or related discipline;
- Be fluent in academic English;
- Hold an academic affiliation;
- Work effectively under tight deadlines.
- Have published articles in authoritative journals.

What do we offer?

Reviewing is voluntary. Publisher does not offer paid options to reviewers whilst it implements the open-access and affordable fee business model for authors. We are open to cooperation with reviewers who support the concept and values of our journal. While most medical journals have high fees both to open-access (free)  and paid to read articles, the MHSJ is low-cost medical research journal who does not impose high costs to authors. However, the MHSJ can promise volunteering reviewers opportunities to save up credits to put towards their own publishing costs in the future.

MHSJ declaration of contribution

MHSJ declaration of contribution

During manuscript submission, the submitting author must provide contact information (full name, email address, institutional affiliation and mailing address) for all of the coauthors. The author who submits the manuscript for publication accepts the responsibility of notifying all coauthors that the manuscript is being submitted. The corresponding author must fill and sign the MHSJ declaration of contribution (in case there are two authors or more) which should be submitted together with manuscript. The co-authors of a paper should be all those persons who have made significant scientific contributions to the work reported and who share responsibility and accountability for the results. Authors should appropriately recognize the contributions of technical staff and data professionals.

The corresponding author should be submitted together with manuscript using the Online Submission form or direct email - publications@pradec.eu. All detected cases of scientific misconduct will be documented and the appropriate institutions and entities will be notified.

MHSJ paper submission

MHSJ journal online submission form

[recaptcha]

Submission terms and conditions

The author and co-authors of the article strictly commit to the policy of editors by accepting these terms and conditions

  • Authors are responsible to read and accept fee (215 euro) payment obligations of the targeted journal. The website has clear information about publication fees and payment terms. When paper accepted and published the author is obliged to fulfill his/ her fee payment obligations in the shortest time after the invoice issued.
  • The primary version of the journal is the online version. Therefore, we do not send a printed copy to the author(s) of the published article. Publisher does not make profits via subscription or sales of print copies. The publisher offers the full content for free access to the public and without restrictions. 
  • All rules and requirements relevant to the chosen type of submission are read and understood. Sending submission means accepted by the author/submitter all responsibility related to editorial and publishing conditions.
  • Submission technical requirements are read and accepted in designing and preparing the research paper
  • Please note that scientific editing might change the format and correct the writing to make it conventional with editorial policy.
  • Responsibility for facts and opinions presented in the contents of journals, electronic and/or printed rests exclusively with the authors, other submitters if there is relevance. Their interpretations do not necessarily reflect the views of publisher or editors, affiliated or partnering with journals and with authors institutions.
  • F.A.Q. must be visited if there is an additional reason in clarifying editorial policy. The editors can contact editors via email when it is accepted
  • Neither the publisher nor the editors can be held responsible for errors or any consequences arising from the use of information contained in this journal.
  • Rejected manuscripts will not be returned to the author.
  • The submitted article after evaluation can be published in elaborating/projecting online issues which differ ahead/or back from the submission date up to 3 consequent issues or 6 months interval. 
  • The version of an article which is published online is considered the final and complete version. Even though it is possible to correct this version, our policy (in common with other publishers) is not to do so, except in very limited circumstances. When an author wishes to update the published paper it can be possible within 4 weeks after publication. 
  • Article after the publication is not subject to removal, except for the sole discretion of the publisher. When editors screen, review and publish the article online or/end in print the article cannot be withdrawn until the decision of editors and publisher. The published articles go immediately to indexing archives and DOI depositories. 
  • Full rights for the removal of the publication of the article remain to the publisher. Retraction or removal of published article can arise in very rear and exceptional circumstances. Usually, it takes a long time to make a deeper analysis, examination of reasons and negotiations.
  • After receiving of the article editors and publisher usually publish immediately online the metadata. After screening and reviewing the full article can be published. The time length between submission and publication of metadata and the full article can be different and make hours, days or months. All this process is usually related to merits, quality of the paper, internal editorial processes, other factors. When necessary, the editors can issue proof of acceptance to the applied author.
  • The author is responsible for avoiding multiple submissions of the same article to other journals. PRADEC editors can charge authors for additional fees when it will be found that similar article was published in parallel. We can contact and inform the relevant journals about multiple practice of the author. When there are signs and suspicions about duplicate submission behaviour of the authors the publisher monitors periodically online during 12 weeks.
  • Website content, information, or terms and conditions may be revised without formal notice. We cannot guarantee that this website will be updated on a regular basis or otherwise provide the most current or accurate information that may be available.
  • No part of the material protected by this copyright notice may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the copyright owner.

MHSJ guide to authors

MHSJ guide to authors

IMPORTANT: This guide does not represent a complete and all-in-one instruction. Both experienced and starting scholars should better to use many good manuals available on the internet on how to write a good medical research. Though, this guide provides basic instructions how to accurately submit the research paper to the chosen journal - Medical and Health Sciences Journal (MHSJ).

Model of peer-review procedures

All articles to MHSJ undergo screening and followed with the peer-reviewing process. After initial screening, the titles and abstracts of the articles, which receive the positive evaluation, will be published online. Every article proceeds single-blind peer-review analysis by editorial and external experts. This model is preferred by the most medical journals. Reviewers should evaluate the quality of an article based both on established criteria and own views of experts. A reviewer is expected to fill the review form and send to the editorial department.

Sample article

Please read the following guidelines and use the sample article format for submission of your paper since only articles formatted accordingly may be accepted.

Quality control

Papers accepted undergo quality control by Editorial board and peer reviewers. All research articles in these journals undergo peer review process, based on initial editor screening and anonymous expertise of reviewers. Articles previously published, those under consideration by another journal, and those with a pre-existing copyright may not be submitted. The author must ensure that about half of the paper contents or core idea has not been published anywhere else. In other words, authors should prove the considerable adjustment made and value added in their submissions.

Language

Articles must be written in English.

Title

Concise and informative. Avoid abbreviations. The title should predict the content of the research article, be interesting to the reader. Preferably, the title should reflect the tone of the writing and contain important keywords of the research paper.

Author names and affiliations

Full names should be provided. The authors should clearly separate the first and second names as it is important for the proper writing of citation record. Please indicate affiliations of the author. Indicate the corresponding address of the main author. Indicate all affiliations with a lower-case superscript letter immediately after the Author's name and in front of the appropriate address.

Contacts of the authors

Ensure that telephone and fax numbers (with country and area code) are provided in addition to the e-mail address and the complete postal address.

Abstract

Authors should write not narrative, but structured style of the abstract. "Structured abstract uses subheadings. Structured abstracts are becoming more popular for basic scientific and clinical studies, since they standardize the abstract and ensure that certain information is included. This is very useful for readers who search for articles on the internet. Often the abstract is displayed by a search engine, and on the basis of the abstract, the reader will decide whether or not to download the full article. With a structured abstract, the reader is more likely to be given the information which they need to decide whether to go on to the full article and so this style is encouraged". (for details see the [Budgell B. Guidelines to the writing of case studies. The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association. 2008;52(4):199-204.]).

Basically, the abstract  must include the following five parts:

- Background.
- Aim or purpose of research.
- Methods used.
- Findings/results.
- Conclusion.
 
Background. In most cases, the background can be framed in just 2–3 sentences, with each sentence describing a different aspect of the information referred to above; sometimes, even a single sentence may suffice. (for details see the [Andrade C. How to write a good abstract for a scientific paper or conference presentation. Indian Journal of Psychiatry. 2011;53(2):172-175. doi:10.4103/0019-5545.82558.]).
 
Methods used. The methods section is usually the second-longest section in the abstract. It should contain enough information to enable the reader to understand what was done, and how. (for details see the [Andrade C. How to write a good abstract for a scientific paper or conference presentation. Indian Journal of Psychiatry. 2011;53(2):172-175. doi:10.4103/0019-5545.82558.]).
 
Results. The results section is the most important part of the abstract and nothing should compromise its range and quality. This is because readers who peruse an abstract do so to learn about the findings of the study. The results section should, therefore, be the longest part of the abstract and should contain as much detail about the findings as the journal word count permits. (for details see the [Andrade C. How to write a good abstract for a scientific paper or conference presentation. Indian Journal of Psychiatry. 2011;53(2):172-175. doi:10.4103/0019-5545.82558.]).
 
Conclusions. This important section should cover: the primary take-home message; the additional findings of importance; and the perspective. (for details see the [Andrade C. How to write a good abstract for a scientific paper or conference presentation. Indian Journal of Psychiatry. 2011;53(2):172-175. doi:10.4103/0019-5545.82558.]).

Illustrations

Graphics should be done in MS Word and must be editable.

Tables

Tables should be numbered consecutively in the text in Arabic numerals and printed on separate sheets. Any manuscript which does not conform to the above instructions may be returned for the necessary revision before publication.

Footnotes

The use of footnotes should be kept to a minimum and numbered consecutively throughout the text with superscript Arabic numerals.

References

References to publications should be as follows: “Nelson (1992) noted that...” or “This problem has been studied previously (e.g., Smith et al., 1969)”.

The author should make sure that there is a strict one-to-one correspondence between the names and years in the text and those on the list. The list of references should appear at the end of the main text. It should be double-spaced and listed in alphabetical order by author's name.

We have changed the citation style. The authors should use the NLM style (National Library of Medicine).

Journal articles:

For more details, you can use the official online guide from the National Library of Medicine.
  1. Petitti DB, Crooks VC, Buckwalter JG, Chiu V. Blood pressure levels before dementia. Arch Neurol. 2005 Jan;62(1):112-6.
  2. Jun BC, Song SW, Park CS, Lee DH, Cho KJ, Cho JH. The analysis of maxillary sinus aeration according to aging process: volume assessment by 3-dimensional reconstruction by high-resolutional CT scanning. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Mar;132(3):429-34.
  3. Meneton P, Jeunemaitre X, de Wardener HE, MacGregor GA. Links between dietary salt intake, renal salt handling, blood pressure, and cardiovascular diseases. Physiol Rev. 2005 Apr;85(2):679-715.
  4. Bruno-Ambrosius K, Yucel-Lindberg T, Twetman S. Salivary buffer capacity in relation to menarche and progesterone levels in saliva from adolescent girls: a longitudinal study. Acta Odontol Scand. 2004 Oct;62(5):269-72.
  5. Fuentes Ramirez M, Lopez Moreno S. [Social health research: recent communications in Salud Publica de Mexico]. Salud Publica Mex. 2005 Jan-Feb;47(1):5-7. Spanish.

Journal articles with an organization as the author:

For more details, you can use the official online guide from the National Library of Medicine.
  1. American Diabetes Association. Diabetes update. Nursing. 2003 Nov;Suppl:19-20, 24.
  2. Parkinson Study Group. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of rasagiline in levodopa-treated patients with Parkinson disease and motor fluctuations: the PRESTO study. Arch Neurol. 2005 Feb;62(2):241-8.
  3. Merritt, Hawkins & Associates. 2004 survey of physicians 50 to 65 years old. J Med Assoc Ga. 2004;93(3):21-6.
  4. Institute of Medical Illustrators. Photography of cleft audit patients. J Audiov Media Med. 2004 Dec;27(4):170-4.
  5. Sugarterapias es Onkologiai Szakmai Kollegium. [Methodologic recommendations of the Oncology and Radiotherapy College. Protocol for oncology care. Diagnostic algorithms in the course of patient follow-up]. Magy Onkol. 2004;48(4):339-47. Hungarian.

Journal articles in a language other than English:

For more details, you can use the official online guide from the National Library of Medicine.
  1. Berrino F, Gatta G, Crosignani P. [Case-control evaluation of screening efficacy]. Epidemiol Prev. 2004 Nov-Dec;28(6):354-9. Italian.
  2. Bechade D, Desrame J, Raynaud JJ, Algayres JP. [Oesophageal ulcer associated with the use of bacampicillin]. Presse Med. 2005 Feb 26;34(4):299-300. French.
  3. Zhao L, Li H, Han D. [Effects of intestinal endotoxemia on the development of cirrhosis in rats]. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2001 Jul;9 Suppl:21-3. Chinese.
  4. Calera Rubio AA, Roel Valdes JM, Casal Lareo A, Gadea Merino R, Rodrigo Cencillo F. Riesgo quimico laboral: elementos para un diagnostico en Espana [Occupational chemical risk: elements for a diagnostic in Spain]. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2005 Mar-Apr;79(2):283-95. Spanish.References

Standard books with initials for authors:

For more details, you can use the official online guide from the National Library of Medicine.
  1. Jenkins PF. Making sense of the chest x-ray: a hands-on guide. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005. 194 p.
  2. Eyre HJ, Lange DP, Morris LB. Informed decisions: the complete book of cancer diagnosis, treatment, and recovery. 2nd ed. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; c2002. 768 p.
  3. Iverson C, Flanagin A, Fontanarosa PB, Glass RM, Glitman P, Lantz JC, Meyer HS, Smith JM, Winker MA, Young RK. American Medical Association manual of style. 9th ed. Baltimore (MD): Williams & Wilkins; 1998. 660 p.
  4. Wenger NK, Sivarajan Froelicher E, Smith LK, Ades PA, Berra K, Blumenthal JA, Certo CME, Dattilo AM, Davis D, DeBusk RF, Drozda JP Jr, Fletcher BJ, Franklin BA, Gaston H, Greenland P, McBride PE, McGregor CGA, Oldridge NB, Piscatella JC, Rogers FJ. Cardiac rehabilitation. Rockville (MD): Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (US); 1995. 202 p.
  5. Iverson C, Flanagin A, Fontanarosa PB, et al. American Medical Association manual of style. 9th ed. Baltimore (MD): Williams & Wilkins; 1998. 660 p

Contributions to books:

For more details, you can use the official online guide from the National Library of Medicine.
  1. Whiteside TL, Heberman RB. Effectors of immunity and rationale for immunotherapy. In: Kufe DW, Pollock RE, Weichselbaum RR, Bast RC Jr, Gansler TS, Holland JF, Frei E 3rd, editors. Cancer medicine 6. Hamilton (ON): BC Decker Inc; 2003. p. 221-8.
  2. Rojko JL, Hardy WD Jr. Feline leukemia virus and other retroviruses. In: Sherding RG, editor. The cat: diseases and clinical management. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1989. p. 229-332.
  3. Kone BC. Metabolic basis of solute transport. In: Brenner BM, Rector FC, editors. Brenner and Rector’s the kidney. 8th ed. Vol. 1. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; c2008. p. 130-55.
  4. Erin, Jane N.; Fazzi, Diane L.; Gordon, Robert L.; Isenberg, Sherwin J.; Paysse, Evelyn A. Vision focus: understanding the medical and functional implications of vision loss. In: Pogrund, Rona L.; Fazzi, Diane L., editors. Early focus: working with young children who are blind or visually impaired and their families. 2nd ed. New York: AFB Press; c2002. p. 52-106.
  5. Buckenmaier CC 3rd. Austere environment anesthesia. In: Steele SM, Nielsen KC, Klein SM, editors. Ambulatory anesthesia and perioperative analgesia. New York: McGraw-Hill, Medical Publications Division; c2005. p. 357-70.
  6. Otado JA, Akukwe C, Collins JW Jr. Disparate African American and white infant mortality rates in the United States. In: Livingston IL, editor. Praeger handbook of Black American health: policies and issues behind disparities in health. 2nd ed. Westport (CT): Praeger; 2004. p. 355-68.
  7. de Mattiello ML, Maneiro M, Buglione S. Sensitivity to movement of configurations of achromatic and chromatic points in amblyopic patients. In: Mellon JD, Pokorny J, Knoblauch K, editors. Normal and defective colour vision. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003. p. 154-9.

Submission fee payment

Standard submission & service fee is 120 Euro (for 2018 volume). The fee is due to pay only after receiving the positive review and formal acceptance letter from the editor. The fee provides compensation of a range services related to expertise, scientific and technical editing, printing, electronic storing and web-managing. All papers are printed online (with corresponding online ISSN) and in print form (with corresponding Print ISSN). The major version of MHSJ publication is online (electronic) with eISSN 1804-5014. The fee is not a subject to guarantee the sending printed copy via standard air mail.

Payments options

You will receive an invoice with several payment methods you can choose after the letter of acceptance.

Important

Payments must be done only after the final letter of acceptance of a paper for publication.

Electronic submission

Papers must be submitted electronically to mhsj@pradec.eu or publications@pradec.eu. For any further information please contact us.